Drunkenblog turns back time with this classic Steve Jobs demo of NeXTSTEP 3.0. I especially enjoy the small digs he gets in about the PC and Mac.

Back in 1994 I had moved from Salt Lake to Seattle right out of college and took a job at Wolfe Internet as a support technician. Our entire staff worked on NeXT systems. With their svelte looks and gorgeous black tint I thought they were the coolest looking computers I’d ever seen. I didn’t realize at the time how advanced and ahead of the curve they were in many areas. My initial impressions with the web at that time came through Netscape Navigator on that NeXT machine. Programs were quick to launch. Websites would magically jump to the screen and everything felt within reach and intuitive. It wasn’t until I was forced to use a Windows 95 machine that I realized how lucky I’d been to have a NeXT. Unfortunately, back then you could purchase 8–10 no name PCs for the price of one NeXT system.

Looking back at NeXT it’s easy to see the influence it had on Apple’s OSX such as the inclusion of the “Dock” made popular by OSX but first found in NeXT. Those were some very fun times to be involved in the computer industry.

Apple has now sold over 250 million songs off its iTunes music store. Although this sounds impressive it’s a drop in the bucket compared to the number of songs being traded on p2p networks. I’d like to know two other numbers:

• Of the $248 million (~99 cents a song) what % did Apple hand over to the record labels?
• Of the amount paid out to the record labels, was % made it into the hands of the artists?

Apple created iTunes obviously to support it’s highly profitable iPod which makes sense. Just like MusicMatch uses its online music store to push users to upgrade to MusicMatch Jukebox Plus. One can only hope that eventually the record labels and the RIAA will see the light and drop prices to more reasonable levels and lessen the use restrictions. Until that happens I won’t be purchasing tracks/albums from any online music store.

Are iPod owners more likely to puchase from an online music store than those who buy more advanced mp3 players like the Rio Karma or iRiver models that have more features but are less user friendly? I’ve owned an iPod and, compared with my iRiver H-120, it was easier to use once the songs were on the device. But, at least on a Windows XP machine, the iRiver is much easier to use when it comes to moving songs on and off the device. For how I use my mp3 player the iRiver runs circles around the iPod, but I know I’m in the minority. Maybe iPod users value simplicity over features and don’t like the idea of searching the p2p networks along with dealing with fake files and slow downloads. Whatever the reason it’s very clear that iPods are driving strong iTune sales.

Will it ever stop? From the likes of it it appears the RIAA will continue extracting a few thousand dollars from potential customers who make mp3 files available for download over p2p networks. The only reason I can see why this makes sense is that the RIAA figures a settlement of, say $3000, is more than an individual will spend on music over his/her lifetime. What other reason could they concoct that makes financial sense in this regard? Do they assume that after coughing up $3000 these people will suddenly begin paying for music again? I can’t imagine paying the RIAA $3000 puts a person in the mood to purchase music anytime soon. I’d be so angry I’d probably never purchase another CD again in my lifetime. I’d just find other means of finding and sharing music. It would force me underground.  

Why would I pay 99 cents for a song at iTunes or Musicmatch and be expected to keep track of the usibility restictions? I want to be able to listen to my music on any computer, any portable device, and share my music collection with any of my friends and family just as I’ve been doing with CDs and tapes for years. I don’t make my 40 gig mp3 collection available to anyone over the internet, but I do like to share music I buy or download with friends and family. It’s just like the radio in the sense that it allows me and others to explore new music we’d have otherwise not found. When I hear a song I really like I will buy the CD and support the artist. But the days of paying $16 for a CD containing one good song and a bunch of filler are over. I’ll continue to purchase CDs when they cost under $12 and contain more than just a couple of good songs. But until the RIAA lawsuits stop I’ll continue to fire up Shareaza or WarezP2P whenever I’m just looking to sample an individual track.

Has there been a more obnoxious piece of software than Real Player? I remember back in ’96 hearing a radio commercial about this new software product called Real Audio which could stream audio over the internet. I recall thinking how cool that sounded and went home and downloaded it. Back in the days of 28k dialup the audio wasn’t high quality and the streams were choppy at times but the concept was cool and anyone could see this was going to make waves down the road.

So fast forward a few years to the time Real Audio changes its name to just Real and begins to complain about the Microsoft monopoly and the inclusion of Media Player on every copy of Windows. This is the time when idiots at Real decided they had to be “in your face” with their products. If they couldn’t keep Microsoft’s Media Player off your machine they could pester you at every turn. Real Player is like installed spam all over your computer. Once Real Player is installed it attempts to take over your computer. It puts itself all over your system including the system tray, quick start menu and programs menu. It’s simply the most annoying product I’ve ever installed on my system by a wide margin. And good luck trying to figure out the install process and not having the Real Center auto-launch in your system tray each time you boot Windows.

It’s been a while since I’ve installed any Real product because it feels so creepy, so slimy. It’s just not worth the hassle even if the video/audio stream is only available in a Real format. What happened at Real? Did a group of executives sit around and brainstorm ideas on how to make their products as annoying as possible? Led by Rob Glaser, Real has taken a revolutionary product and ruined it.

I expect Real to become even more aggressive in pushing its products on customer’s computers having been outflanked by Apple and the popular iTunes. Good riddance, Real.

ESPN is reporting that Karl Malone is leaning towards retirement. As a lifelong Utah Jazz fan I was disappointed he wore out his welcome in Utah and forced the trade to the Lakers. I recall Karl stating that he wasn’t interested in growing the young talent on the Jazz roster so he got his wish to play for a contender and was shipped off to play with Shaq and Kobe, two of the most selfish players in the league. Karl didn’t get a ring or a scoring title although he did make a pass at Kobe’s wife.

Don’t you wish you could have retired with the same class shown by John Stockon?

In what has to be one the strangest stories I’ve heard in a while, the Christian Conservative group says the Spongebob cartoon characters are being exploited to promote the acceptance of homosexuality. MSNBC adds to the hilarity with this quote:

SpongeBob, who lives in a pineapple under the sea, was “outed” by the U.S. media in 2002 after reports that the TV show and its merchandise was popular with gays.

Doesn’t the Christian Conservative group have anything more important to do than watch cartoons? Dora the Explorer promoting lesbianism can’t be far behind with these wackos.

Additional article
“These Crackpots can be saved” by Michael Ventre at MSNBC

I already have two portable mp3 players (iRiver H120, Nomad Muvo NX) but I still want a Shuffle.

PC Magazine

Bottom Line: Probably the best flash player without a display, the iPod shuffle has excellent audio performance, a low price, a near-weightless design, and interesting random-load/random-play features.

Pros: Very light weight. Top-notch audio performance. Recharges from USB. Can automatically update itself with fresh songs.

Cons: No navigation display, preferences, or settings. A little too minimal for music explorers. Loud enough to cause hearing damage if you’re not careful. Full review

More Reviews

*Russell Beattie compares his new Shuffle with the Muvo

*iPod Lounge has posted an excellent review

*Engadget chimes in with review and tons of pics

*MacWorld likens the Shuffle to your favorite radio station

*Mossberg takes the shuffle for a test drive

From time to time I’ve been known to complain about Microsoft products, especially IE and Windows XP. Actually, I complain about them a lot and several people have asked why I stick with a PC instead of moving to a Mac. I have to admit that the Mac Mini looks very enticing, but I don’t see myself using it as my main machine at home. I can see adding it as a third PC to be mainly used by our 3 year-old daughter. This got me thinking about why I continue to use a PC loaded with Microsoft Windows so put together a list of reasons:

1. I like to tinker and build my own computers. This might not sound like a good reason, but it is for those of us who like to carefully chose every single component that goes into our machines. I’m not just talking about what hard drive or video card to put in my machine either. I’ll research power supplies and aluminum Lian-Li cases for weeks before deciding on the perfect choice for my box.

2. Games, games, games. I know that more and more games are released on the Mac but I want a choice of every single game, and I know they will nearly always be released first on the PC. I can’t imagine sitting around with my Mac while my friends are immersed in a game of Half Life 2.

3. Number of available programs. This doesn’t mean I couldn’t get accustomed to Mac alternatives to Quintessential Player, Desktop Sidebar, or Nero. But it’s still a sizeable investment to research and learn new programs other than those I’ve used for years. Most of my friends run XP so I can oftentimes test out products before I buy.

4. Windows XP is pretty good. It still gives me problems occasionally but overall it’s been quite stable on my system. Sure, it seems to require too many security patches and IE is just terrible, but once it’s tweaked a bit and Firefox is installed, it’s not bad at all. I do hope that Microsoft someday comes around to offering a very scaled down version of Windows minus IE and Media Player and a few other non-essentials.

Having used a PC for the past 15 years I’m still smitten by the Mac. I’ve had an opportunity to use Photoshop on an Apple G5 machine at work and it just feels right. I don’t feel quite at home yet, but I can see really enjoying Jaguar and those applications you hear about that run so well on it like the Adobe apps. I’d love a computer that I don’t have to baby-sit as much as I do my PC. I wish I didn’t have to spend so much time keeping spyware/adware off my machine. So maybe this is the year that we are no longer a PC-centric household.

I realized we’d received a lot of rain this past week but had no idea the scope of damage it would cause. Our family moved from rainy Seattle to a normally dry southern Utah this summer so when we had rain four days straight we didn’t think much about it.

Unfortunately the combination of heavy rains and fast snow melt-off has caused close to $200 million in home and property damage to this small community of Santa Clara and St. George. This past Tuesday I returned from work just in time to turn on the TV and watch home after home fall into the raging Santa Clara river. Most of the homes are just a few minutes from our house in Ivins.

On Wednesday morning we drove though parts of Santa Clara high enough to view the devastation. We saw families with all their belongings loaded onto trucks while some had less than ten minutes to grab what they could and then get out of their house before it disappeared into the river. Here’s one photo I took yesterday that shows one of the many homes that were lost. We feel very blessed to be safe and hope those affected by the floods find quick resolution.

Click here to enlarge

You won’t find it on his blog’s main page but he does have a Firefox link on his press policy page. He knows a quality product when he sees it.